
In The Heat Of The Moment

In The Heat Of The Moment
December 3, 2019
•
53m
•
Episode Ranking: 16/100
TOPICS: Education Psychology
Episode Description
Hot States & Decision-Making How emotions like anger and fear drive impulsive decisions and why we struggle to recall their intensity once they pass.
Ideabrix Summary
The 'Hidden Brain' episode 'In The Heat Of The Moment' begins with the story of Morgan Smalley, an improv comedian who, after a successful show, impulsively buys a bag of stolen goods from a stranger. This anecdote introduces the central theme of the episode: the hot-cold empathy gap, a psychological phenomenon that explains the disconnect between our actions and decisions in different emotional states. Shankar Vedantam, the host, explains that when we are in a 'hot' state, such as being angry, sexually aroused, or under stress, we often act in ways that our 'cold,' calm, and logical selves would not anticipate or understand. Conversely, when we are in a 'cold' state, it is difficult for us to imagine acting impulsively or unreasonably as we might when 'hot.' The episode further explores the hot-cold empathy gap through the experiences of various individuals. George Lowenstein, a professor of psychology and economics, discusses his concept of the hot-cold empathy gap with examples such as the pain of running up a steep hill and the quick forgetting of the discomfort once it's over. Irene Pemberton's story illustrates the gap as she recounts having unprotected sex despite her extensive sex education, highlighting how sexual arousal can overpower logical decision-making.
Julie Woodpecker's research is then introduced, which examines women's reactions to sexual harassment. Her study reveals a stark contrast between how women anticipate they would respond to harassment and how they actually behave when confronted with it. The episode underscores the complexity of human behavior and the challenges of predicting our actions when our emotional state changes.
Lastly, the podcast discusses training and policy implications. It describes how military training, such as that for Army Rangers, conditions individuals to manage their responses in high-stress situations. Julie Woodpecker's 'fighting fire with fire' program aims to help women respond to sexist comments by having witty retorts ready. George Lowenstein suggests that public policy should account for the hot-cold empathy gap by making tools like condoms readily available or by implementing waiting periods for purchasing firearms.
Julie Woodpecker's research is then introduced, which examines women's reactions to sexual harassment. Her study reveals a stark contrast between how women anticipate they would respond to harassment and how they actually behave when confronted with it. The episode underscores the complexity of human behavior and the challenges of predicting our actions when our emotional state changes.
Lastly, the podcast discusses training and policy implications. It describes how military training, such as that for Army Rangers, conditions individuals to manage their responses in high-stress situations. Julie Woodpecker's 'fighting fire with fire' program aims to help women respond to sexist comments by having witty retorts ready. George Lowenstein suggests that public policy should account for the hot-cold empathy gap by making tools like condoms readily available or by implementing waiting periods for purchasing firearms.
Subscribe to our Premium Plan to learn more.
Discover more about this episode
Summary and conclusion
Key takeaways
Quotes
Vocabulary
Mentioned media
Mentioned people