Skip to main content

How to Change Your Mind (Rebroadcast)

How to Change Your Mind (Rebroadcast)

November 28, 2019

45m

Episode Ranking: 16/100

TOPICS: Evidence-based Science Human Understanding Of Universe Rational Discourse

Episode Description

The Struggle to Change Minds Investigating why people resist changing their opinions, how biases shape beliefs, and strategies for more open-minded thinking.

Ideabrix Summary

The 'How to Change Your Mind (Rebroadcast)' episode of 'Freakonomics Radio' delves into the complex nature of changing one's mind, exploring the psychological, social, and biological factors that influence our ability to adapt our beliefs. The episode begins by highlighting the shift in some Republicans' stance on the death penalty, illustrating how even deeply held beliefs can evolve. The narrative then transitions to personal anecdotes, such as Robert Sapolsky's shift from a devout Orthodox Jew to a staunch atheist, and his broader research into the neurobiological underpinnings of belief and change.

The discussion continues with political scientist Francis Fukuyama, who reflects on his support for the Iraq War and his eventual disillusionment with the planning and assumptions that led to the conflict. Fukuyama's experience underscores the social and emotional investments that often tether us to our beliefs, even in the face of contradictory evidence. The episode also explores the work of economist Julia Schmitz, who suggests that the benefits of holding certain beliefs might outweigh the incentives to change one's mind, especially when those beliefs are tied to one's self-concept or social standing.

The episode further examines the 'illusion of explanatory depth,' a concept introduced by cognitive scientist Steven Sloman. This phenomenon describes how people often overestimate their understanding of complex systems or policies, and how asking them to explain these systems can lead to a reduction in their confidence and a greater openness to changing their views. Matthew Jackson, an economist, adds to the conversation by discussing how information is processed within social networks and how exposure to diverse viewpoints is crucial for breaking down cognitive biases.

The narrative concludes with Sapolsky's insights into the biological roots of empathy and conflict, and how understanding the mechanisms that govern our social behaviors can lead to optimism about human nature's capacity for change.

Discover more about this episode

Summary and conclusion
Key takeaways
Quotes
Vocabulary
Mentioned media
Mentioned people
Go Premium